Why TOGAF Isn’t Enough: A Case Study In Real Enterprise Architecture
Summary
This exploratory case study delves into how a large organisation employed TOGAF as a foundation but ultimately developed a custom enterprise architecture model. It illustrates the components of TOGAF retained, discarded, and the real value garnered through their unique EA practice.
Enterprise Architecture (EA) is viewed as essential for clarity and alignment between IT and business, yet when TOGAF, the most widely adopted EA framework, was implemented in a complex organisation, it did not hold up as expected. Despite certification and executive support for TOGAF, the organisation moved away from many core elements of the framework. Instead, they fostered a more agile architecture practice focused on collaboration and responsiveness, ultimately reshaping how EA was conceived and executed.
The architects found TOGAF too procedural and inadequate for the fast-paced environment, leading to ineffective outcomes. Consequently, they adapted the framework into a bespoke architecture process reflecting actual work dynamics. This case study emphasises how formal frameworks may falter when faced with operational complexities and stresses the importance of contextual intelligence over strict adherence to prescribed methodologies.
Key Points
- TOGAF usage did not equate to the actual application of its methodologies within the organisation.
- Organisations often preserve overarching ideas from EA frameworks while abandoning their structured processes.
- Effective EA necessitates methods tailored to an organisation’s unique culture and operational pace.
- Frameworks like TOGAF risk becoming symbolic if not translated into actionable practices that engage stakeholders.
- Successful enterprise architecture evolves from adaptability and relentless focus on delivering value.
Why should I read this?
This article provides critical insights into the limitations of rigid frameworks like TOGAF in dynamic environments. By reflecting the real-world challenges faced by CIOs and IT leaders, it illustrates the need for adaptable EA practices that deliver value and resonate with organisational objectives. The case study serves as a guide for leaders seeking to develop effective EA functions that transcend theoretical constraints, highlighting the importance of contextual understanding in architecture practice.