Low Code vs. BPM: Differences and Similarities
This article explores how low code and business process management (BPM) can enhance business efficiency, highlighting their unique benefits, methodologies, and the opportunities for integration between the two practices.
Key Insights
- Both low code and BPM aim to streamline operations, but they focus on different aspects of process management.
- Low code encourages faster application development with reduced coding requirements, often empowering non-technical users.
- BPM enhances efficiency by identifying and resolving bottlenecks in workflows through process automation.
- Low-code BPM platforms combine the benefits of both approaches to improve business process management without extensive coding.
- Common use cases for low code and BPM include employee onboarding, customer service management, and expense approval.
Content Summary
Low code development reduces the time and expertise needed to create software, allowing non-technical employees to build applications swiftly through prebuilt modules. This not only accelerates the innovation process but also reduces reliance on professional developers.
On the other hand, BPM focuses on analysing and improving business processes from start to finish, automating workflows and enhancing decision-making with insights into operational efficiencies. BPM’s systematic approach helps organisations identify inefficiencies and adapt to new business requirements.
Although low code and BPM have distinct goals, they can be used together effectively. Businesses can leverage low-code platforms to enhance BPM efficiency, making it accessible to all users regardless of coding expertise.
Context and Relevance
This article is especially relevant as organisations increasingly seek to optimise efficiency through digital transformation. Understanding the differences and synergies between low code and BPM is crucial for companies aiming to implement more agile and effective business processes in today’s fast-paced environment.
By recognising how these methodologies complement each other, businesses can better position themselves to innovate and stay competitive.