Publishers and Law Professors Back Authors in Meta AI Copyright Battle
Publishers and law professors have expressed their support for authors suing Meta over the company’s AI training practices, particularly its use of allegedly pirated books. These academics and organisations believe that Meta’s approach does not align with fair use principles under copyright law.
Key Points
- Amicus briefs filed by publishers and copyright professors defend authors’ rights against Meta’s AI training methods.
- The filing argues that Meta’s usage of thousands of pirated books fails to meet the fair use test as outlined by copyright law.
- Meta’s supporters reference the Google Books ruling, but the opposing parties highlight significant differences in usage contexts.
- There are concerns over the potential cascading impacts on copyright if Meta’s actions are deemed acceptable.
- The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers challenges Meta’s claim of using “publicly available” datasets.
Why should I read this?
This article is crucial for anyone interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence and copyright law. As AI technology evolves, the legalities surrounding its use of literary and creative works become increasingly significant, with implications for authors, publishers, and content creators.
“`