Publishers and Law Professors Back Authors in Meta AI Copyright Battle
Publishers and law professors have come together to support authors in a legal battle against Meta concerning the use of copyrighted materials for AI training. The argument revolves around whether Meta’s practices fall under fair use, given that it allegedly utilises “thousands of pirated books”. The amicus briefs filed in California’s federal court signify a mounting opposition to Meta’s data sourcing methods.
Key Points
- Amicus briefs filed by publishers and law professors support authors suing Meta for alleged copyright infringement.
- Arguments focus on the lack of fair use justification for Meta’s use of pirated materials in AI training.
- The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM) and others challenge Meta’s claims of using “publicly available datasets”.
- Previous Google Books rulings are cited to distinguish between transformative uses of copyrighted works.
- Professors warn of negative consequences for the copyright landscape if Meta’s practices are legitimised.
Why should I read this?
This article highlights important legal and ethical issues regarding the use of copyrighted materials in AI training. As technology and copyright laws evolve, understanding these implications is crucial for authors, publishers, and developers alike. The outcome of this case may set significant precedents for the rights of content creators in the digital age.
“`