CVE fallout: The splintering of the standard vulnerability tracking system has begun
The global system for identifying and tracking security bugs is facing a significant shift. The U.S. government has recently withdrawn funding for the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) programme, which has raised concerns over its future. In response, the EU is moving forward with its own system, the European Union Vulnerability Database (EUVD), which aims to create an independent framework for tracking vulnerabilities. This transition highlights the growing distrust in the U.S. commitment to the CVE infrastructure, leading to potential separate tracking systems for the U.S. and Europe.
Key Points
- The CVE programme faced financial uncertainty due to the U.S. government’s funding cuts.
- The EU has developed the EUVD, which tracks vulnerabilities using its own identifiers alongside CVE-assigned IDs.
- There are concerns over the trustworthiness of the U.S. government in maintaining a stable CVE programme.
- The reliance on a single funding source risks impartiality in vulnerability management.
- New initiatives like the Global CVE Allocation System (GCVE) and the CVE Foundation are emerging in response to the CVE funding crisis.
Why should I read this?
If you’re involved in cybersecurity or tech development, understanding the evolution of the CVE system is crucial. This article dives into the implications of a fragmented vulnerability tracking system—something that could change how vulnerabilities are managed globally. Knowing how these shifts unfold can give you a leg up in securing your applications and systems effectively.