Conservations Say ‘De-Extinction’ Not the Answer to Saving Extinct Species
Conversations around ‘de-extinction’ have been heating up, particularly after the biotech company Colossal announced plans to genetically modify grey wolves, which some hailed as a step towards bringing back the extinct Dire wolf. However, conservationists and bioethicists are sounding alarms about the implications of such science. The consensus? This isn’t conservation, it’s entertainment, and it won’t solve the underlying issues driving species extinction.
Key Points
- Colossal’s genetic modifications to grey wolves have raised ethical concerns among conservationists.
- Experts argue that ‘de-extinction’ does not address the core issues leading to species extinction.
- Naomi Louchouarn stresses the need for behavioural changes over flashy scientific fixes.
- Even proponents of ‘de-extinction’ acknowledge it’s just one tool among many needed to combat biodiversity loss.
- The Trump administration references dire wolf experiments in discussions about reducing endangered species protections.
Why should I read this?
If you’re curious about the balance between scientific innovation and ethical conservation, this article dives deep into an important debate. As we grapple with extinction rates, understanding the difference between flashy tech and practical solutions is crucial. We sifted through the noise for you; it’s a must-read if you care about the future of wildlife!