Top sci-fi convention gets an earful from authors after using AI to screen panelists
Recently, the renowned World Science Fiction Convention (WorldCon) faced significant backlash for using AI to vet potential panelists, causing uproar among authors and fans alike.
Summary
The controversy erupted on April 30 when chair Kathy Bond announced the use of AI software to evaluate over 1,300 panelist applicants. The AI, specifically a ChatGPT model, was employed to gather background information to streamline the vetting process. However, the announcement was poorly received.
Bond clarified that only the panelist’s name was inputted into the AI system, with outputs subject to human verification for accuracy. The AI was meant to flag potential issues like scandals, including racism and harassment, potentially disqualifying individuals from participating in the event.
Key Points
- WorldCon’s use of AI has drawn sharp criticism from authors and industry members, who argue it undermines the creative community.
- Kathy Bond stated that no panelist was excluded solely due to AI assessments and claimed the technology saved substantial volunteer hours.
- Prominent authors like David D. Levine and Jason Sanford have publicly condemned the decision, citing ethical concerns over AI’s implications in creative work.
- Following the backlash, several WorldCon officials resigned from their roles, leading to an apology and commitment to re-evaluate panelists without AI assistance.
- The incident highlights ongoing tensions between the creative arts and AI technology in terms of ethics and rights.
Why should I read this?
If you’re into sci-fi or simply curious about the intersection of technology and creativity, this story is a must-read! It reveals not only the ethical debates surrounding AI in creative spaces but also how a once-respected convention is navigating a tumultuous landscape. Trust us, you won’t want to miss how this drama unfolds!